Proposition 65
Downey Brand’s attorneys have substantial expertise with California’s Proposition 65, and the challenges that this law poses to doing business in California. Our attorneys provide strategic compliance advice and litigation defense to manufacturers, retailers, dischargers, and businesses throughout the supply chain and across all affected industries that are subject to Proposition 65’s requirements.
Our goal is to help our clients understand the risks posed by Prop 65, and to manage those risks effectively and creatively, while still operating a profitable business in the State. Downey Brand’s presence in Sacramento provides us with access to the key agencies and decision makers involved with Prop 65. We work closely with business, advocacy, and trade groups on legislative and regulatory issues and reforms related to Prop 65 and its regulations and policy impacts.
Proposition 65 Litigation & Citizen Suit Defense
We have defended and resolved numerous Prop 65 citizen suit matters, from the pre-litigation notice phase through – when necessary – formal litigation. We have experience with the plaintiff citizen groups that target certain industries and chemicals in their lawsuits, and with the chemicals and industries trending as key targets in Prop 65 citizen suits. We provide honed and experienced advice on the technical intricacies of the statute and understand the scientific arguments that win Prop 65 administrative and litigation matters.
We have defended clients in high-profile and contentious Prop 65 lawsuits alleging exposure to lead in ginger baking products and snack foods, cocamide DEA and titanium dioxide in cosmetics products, di(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate (DEHP) in children’s toys and exercising equipment, TDCPP in children’s products and furniture, DEHP and DiNP in kitchen and garden products and power tools, mercury in seafood, natural and introduced chemicals in soil, and lead in multiple products across industries, including, but not limited to brass lead in glass ware, lead in hardware, and lead in automotive tools and supplies.
We also have experience with alleged discharges to sources of drinking water and have successfully settled cases involving leaking underground storage tanks and alleged discharges to land and groundwater.
Compliance
Downey Brand attorneys also assist our clients in developing compliance programs for doing business in California. We are well-versed in the supply chain nuances that arise when a client first learns of Prop 65 exposure and begins managing its risk. We advise clients on indemnity arrangements and concerns between suppliers, manufacturers, and retailers, as well as on communications between our clients and customers/vendors, to provide protection from the statute’s onerous provisions.
Our clients include oil field produced water disposal facilities along with product manufacturers, distributors and retailers in the following industries: automotive, cleaning products, cosmetics, furniture, food and beverage, HVAC, lead hardware, power tools, forest products, food processing, groceries, pest control, fertilizers, medical devices, notebooks, sports equipment, glassware, kitchen supplies, and lawn and garden products.
Selected Experience
- Represent California League of Food Processors and numerous member retailers and suppliers in Proposition 65 regulatory matters.
- Represent product manufacturers and retailers of consumer goods in defending and settling Proposition 65 matters, both at the pre-litigation notice phase and in litigation across a wide range of industries, including but not limited to, cosmetics, food and beverage, apparel, lead hardware, power tools, notebooks, sports equipment, glassware, and cleaning products.
- Served as co-counsel in successfully defending a national food company against Proposition 65 and unfair competition claims.
- Represent California League of Food Processors and numerous member retailers and suppliers in Proposition 65 regulatory matters.
- Represent product manufacturers and retailers of consumer goods in defending and settling Proposition 65 matters, both at the pre-litigation notice phase and in litigation across a wide range of industries, including but not limited to, cosmetics, food and beverage, apparel, lead hardware, power tools, notebooks, sports equipment, glassware, and cleaning products.
- Advise clients on Proposition 65 compliance programs and supply chain management issues resulting from Proposition 65 compliance decisions.
- Advise clients on indemnity concerns and supply chain communications following Proposition 65 compliance programs and litigation claims.
- Advised and represented multi-national consumer products/electronics manufacturer in Proposition 65 action for alleged failure to warn on lead exposures in consumer products.
- Advised and represented regional grocery store chain in multiple Proposition 65 claims for alleged failure to warn in conjunction with sale of products.
- Served as co-counsel in successfully defending a national food company against Proposition 65 and unfair competition claims.
- Defended manufacturers, suppliers, and retailers in defense of Proposition 65 actions regarding acrylamide, phthalates, and lead.
John C. McCarron
Partner
Sacramento 916.520.5450
Kathryn L. Oehlschlager
Partner
San Francisco 415.848.4820
Robert P. Soran
Partner
Sacramento 916.520.5364
Announcements
4 related items-
February 1, 2022Downey Brand Associate Alexandra Lizano Selected to Join Environmental Law Institute’s Emerging Leaders Initiative
-
December 13, 2019Downey Brand Welcomes Brenda Bass to Natural Resources Practice in Sacramento
-
October 15, 2018Natalie Kirkish and Benjamin Lee Join Downey Brand’s Natural Resource Team
-
December 12, 2017Downey Brand Names Six New Partners
Speaking Engagements / Events
2 related items-
June 29, 2021Steps to Take Your Risk Temperature and Manage Prop. 65 Liabilities
Specialty Food Association Prop. 65 Webinar Series -
October 17, 2019Managing Risk in the Food Delivery World: Understanding Product Recall
Joint Presentation Hosted by Downey Brand, EPIC, and Berrian Insurance Group
Legal Alerts
30 related items-
February 6, 2024US EPA Proposes Rules to Expand Cleanup of PFAS at Hazardous Waste Sites
Environmental Law -
July 21, 2023OEHHA Releases Second Public Review Draft of Public Health Goals for PFOA and PFOS in Drinking Water
Environmental Law -
July 30, 2021OEHHA Issues Highly Anticipated Draft Public Health Goals for PFOA and PFOS in Drinking Water
Environmental law -
March 12, 2021State Water Board Issues Notification and Response Levels for PFBS in Drinking Water; DTSC to Finalize Carpets and Rugs with PFAS as “Priority Products” in 2021
Environmental Law -
July 23, 2020California PFAS Push Now Includes POTWs as State Water Board Rolls Out New Testing Order
Environmental Law -
April 21, 2020OEHHA’s Proposed “Clarifications” to Proposition 65 Clear and Reasonable Warning Regulations Actually Represent a Significant Change
Environmental Law -
March 30, 2020UPDATE: EPA May Exempt Certain Manufacturers and Importers from TSCA Fees Rule
Environmental Law -
March 23, 2020Manufacturers and Importers May Be Surprised By The New TSCA Fees Rule
Environmental Law -
October 24, 2019PFAS Are Here: First Round of Results Show PFAS in California Drinking Water Supply Wells
Environmental Law -
August 28, 2019California State Water Resources Control Board Significantly Lowers PFAS Notification Levels
Environmental Law -
March 13, 2019State Water Board Announces Sweeping Investigation and Phased Sampling of Potential Industrial and Municipal Sources of PFAS
Environmental Law -
February 19, 2019EPA Unveils Its Long-Awaited PFAS Action Plan – Does It Represent Any Progress?
Environmental Law -
November 2, 2018OEHHA Proposes Amendments to Prop. 65 Reproductive Toxicity Sampling Requirements for Food Products; New Prop. 65 Regulations for PFAS Take Effect November 10, 2018
Environmental Law -
September 6, 2018The Latest in the Prop. 65 World: Jury Trials; Inorganic Arsenic in Rice; and the FDA Weighs in on Coffee
Environmental Law -
July 31, 2018Court Determines Breakfast Cereal Currently Does Not Require Prop 65 Warnings
Environmental Law -
June 19, 2018U.S. District Court Denies California Attorney General’s Request to Reconsider Holding that Proposition 65 Warnings for Glyphosate in Herbicide Products are Misleading
Environmental Law -
June 18, 2018California Proposes Regulation that Proposition 65 Cancer Warnings Are Not Required for Coffee
Environmental Law -
May 23, 2018Winemakers Prevail in Arguing That Providing Current Safe Harbor Warning for Alcoholic Beverages Is Compliant with Prop 65
Environmental Law -
May 11, 2018Checking-in? New Proposition 65 Exposure Warnings for Hotels and Lodging Establishments Take Effect August 30, 2018
Environmental Law -
April 4, 2018Tentative Ruling Could Mean You Have to Give A Prop 65 Warning for Every Cup of Coffee You Sell or Give to Consumers
Environmental Law -
March 14, 2018The Latest in the Prop. 65 World: Processed Meat; Lead and Cadmium in Chocolate; and Glyphosate in Herbicides
Environmental Law -
November 6, 2017New Proposition 65 Clear and Reasonable Warning Regulations Are Effective in 2018
Environmental Law -
October 12, 2017California Enacts Legislation in an Attempt to Level the Playing Field in Proposition 65 Enforcement Actions
Environmental Law -
October 5, 2017Proposition 65 Warning Required for Furfuryl Alcohol as of September 30, 2017
Environmental Law -
September 9, 2016OEHHA Adopts Unclear Amendments to the “Clear and Reasonable Warning” Regulations – Exacerbating Proposition 65 Problems
Environmental Law -
January 21, 2015New Proposed Proposition 65 Regulations Equal Less Help and More Hurt (and Litigation) for Industry
Environmental Law -
January 12, 2015New Proposition 65 Warning Regulations Released Today!
Environmental Law -
September 26, 2014Uncertainty Remains Over DTSC’s Draft Priority Products Work Plan
Environmental Law -
May 13, 2014DTSC’s Initial Priority Product List – Lessons Learned
Environmental Law -
April 15, 2014Warning! More Changes Ahead for California Proposition 65
Environmental Law
Publications
38 related items-
March 2024A Year in Review – Prop. 65 Notices: Unleaded Gasoline Notices Emerge as a Top Trend Across the State in 2023
Proposition 65: Trends and Highlights -
November 2023Surprising Surge in Sauces Tops Prop. 65 Food Notices in Third Quarter 2023
Proposition 65: Trends and Highlights -
July 2023Prop. 65 Plaintiffs are “Fishing” for More…
Proposition 65: Trends and Highlights -
February 20232022 Prop. 65 Roundup: Over 3,100 Notices for the Usual Suspects Including Lead and Phthalates, Plus New Trends Targeting Textiles and Apparel, and Common Holiday Spices
Proposition 65: Trends and Highlights in 2022 -
November 2022Proposition 65 Quarterly Notice – Third Quarter 2022: Citizen Plaintiff Groups Continue to Pursue Seafood, Ceramics, and Personal Care Products
Proposition 65: Trends and Highlights July 2022-September 2022 -
July 2022Proposition 65 Notices of the Month – June 2022: Seafood Products Catch Renewed Interest and Ceramic Glassware Remain Key Target of Citizen Plaintiff Groups
Proposition 65: Trends and Highlights in June 2022 -
June 2022Proposition 65 Notices of the Month – May 2022: “Greatest Hits” Such as Metals in Foods and Phthalates in Plastics & Chemicals in Cannabis-Related Accessories Creating Interest for Citizen Plaintiff Groups
Proposition 65: Trends and Highlights in May 2022 -
April 2022Proposition 65 Notices of the Month – April 2022: Continued Focus of Alleged Lead in Glass Ceramic Products
Proposition 65: Trends and Highlights in April 2022 -
April 2022Proposition 65 Notices of the Month – March 2022: Paper Straws and Food Claims Galore
Proposition 65: Trends and Highlights in March 2022 -
March 2022Proposition 65 Notices of the Month – February 2022: Cassava Flour and Chips, Hot Cocoa, Ceramics and Glassware, Boots and Shoes, and Bicycle Helmets
Proposition 65: Trends and Highlights in February 2022 -
February 2022Proposition 65 Notices of the Month – January 2022: Lead in Food Products including Dietary Supplements and Spices Remain a Popular Target for Citizen Enforcers, Along with Alleged Phthalates and BPA and Various Consumer Products
Proposition 65: Trends and Highlights in January 2022 -
January 20222021 Prop. 65 Roundup: More Than 3,000 Notices for the Usual Suspects Including Lead and Heavy Metals in Various Foods, Alleged Phthalates in Plastic Consumer Products, and Newer Trends Targeting Peppermint Extract, CBD Oil, and Sunscreen
Proposition 65: Trends and Highlights in December 2021 -
November 2021Proposition 65 Notices of the Month – October 2021: Wildlife & Duck Calls, Socks, Spices, Fruits & Vegetables, and Pasta
Proposition 65: Trends and Highlights in October 2021 -
November 3, 2021New California Laws Ban PFAS in Juvenile Products and Food Packaging
-
October 2021Proposition 65 Notices of the Month – September 2021: Fenugreek, Psyllium Husk Powder, Beet Powder, Stuffed Grape Leaves, Ceramics and Plastic Bags, Pouches, and Tool Grips
Proposition 65: Trends and Highlights in September 2021 -
September 2021Proposition 65 Notices of the Month – August 2021: Plastic Consumer Products and Components, Tortilla Chips, Banana Chips, Almond Butter, Canned Fruit, and Sanitizers
Proposition 65: Trends and Highlights in August 2021 -
August 2021Proposition 65 Notices of the Month – July 2021: Protein Powders, Tea, Molasses, Hand Sanitizer, Sunscreen, CBD Oil, Receipt Paper, and Plastic Face Shields
Proposition 65: Trends and Highlights in July 2021 -
July 2021Proposition 65 Notices of the Month – June 2021: Peppermint Extract, Salted Plums/Saladitos, Canned Fruits, Seaweed & Seafood, Pliable Plastics, and Withdrawal of Wood Dust Notices
Proposition 65: Trends and Highlights in June 2021 -
June 2021Prop 65 Food Claims Continue in 2021
California Food Producer, Edition 1 -
June 2021Proposition 65 Notices of the Month – May 2021: Notice Activity Rebounds; Plaintiff Groups Target Tools that Generate Wood Dust, Makeup, Plastic Products, Sunflower Seeds, and Fruits/Vegetables
Proposition 65: Trends and Highlights in May 2021 -
May 2021Proposition 65 Notices of the Month – April 2021: Overall Declines in the Number of Food Notices for Acrylamide and Heavy Metals, and in the Number of Consumer Product Notices for Phthalates
Proposition 65: Trends and Highlights in April 2021 -
April 21, 2021Proposition 65: Legal and Technical Implications of Listing PFOA as a Carcinogen
-
April 2021Proposition 65 Notices of the Month – March 2021: Plastic Consumer Products, Fruits & Vegetables, New Chemical Pulegone in Peppermint Extract, and Relief for Acrylamide Claims
Proposition 65: Trends and Highlights in March 2021 -
March 2021Proposition 65 Notices of the Month – February 2021: Fruits & Vegetables, Pretzels, Chips, Tostadas, Seafood, and More Plastic Products Targeted by Plaintiff Groups
Proposition 65: Trends and Highlights in February 2021 -
February 2021Proposition 65 Notices of the Month – January 2021: Duck Callers, Duck (To Eat), More Seafood, Fruits & Vegetables, and Plastic Products Targeted by Plaintiff Groups
Proposition 65: Trends and Highlights in January 2021 -
January 2021Proposition 65 Notices of the Month – 2020 Prop. 65 Roundup: Over 3,500 Notices Sent Alleging Warning Labels Required for Hundreds of Different Products Including Plastic Bags & Cases, Baby and Toddler Foods, Seafood, Roasted Snack Foods, Leafy Green Vegetables, and Cosmetics
Proposition 65: Trends and Highlights in December 2020 -
December 2020Proposition 65 Notices of the Month – Nov. 2020: Pretzels, Molasses, Sunflower Seeds, Shampoos, Leather Gloves & Fishing Weights – All Targeted by Citizen Plaintiff Groups
Proposition 65: Trends and Highlights in November 2020 -
November 2020Proposition 65 Notices of the Month – Oct. 2020: Lead in Food, Diethanolamine in Personal Care Products, Formaldehyde in Bed Sheet Sets, and, As Always, Acrylamide in Snack Foods, and Phthalates in Plastics
Proposition 65: Trends and Highlights in October 2020 -
October 2020Proposition 65 Notices of the Month – Sept. 2020: Hundreds of Notices Allege Acrylamide in Snack Foods and Phthalates in Plastic Bags, Other Notices Target Personal Care Products
Proposition 65: Trends and Highlights in September 2020 -
September 2020Proposition 65 Notices of the Month – August 2020: Leafy Greens, Crackers, Fishing Weights, Shaving & Bath Gel, Mascara, Plastic Cases & Purses, Dietary Supplements and Bamboo Pillowcases
Proposition 65: Trends and Highlights in August 2020 -
August 2020Proposition 65 Notices of the Month – July 2020: Notices Decline for Acrylamide in Snack Foods; Chocolate, Canned Goods, Dietary Supplements, Seaweed, and Seafood Noticed for Lead & BPA; Phthalate Notices for Plastic Bags and PVC Plastics Continue In Large Quantities
Proposition 65: Trends and Highlights in July 2020 -
July 2020Proposition 65 Notices of the Month – June 2020: Over 70 Seafood Products, Chips, Pretzels, Bread, Popcorn, Cookies, Dietary Supplements and Wheel Chair Components Attacked by Citizen Plaintiffs as COVID-19 Summer Begins
Proposition 65: Trends and Highlights in June 2020 -
June 2020Proposition 65 Notices of the Month – May 2020: Seafood, Waffles, Nut Products, Canned Goods, and Boxing Gloves Targeted by Plaintiffs in Third Month of COVID-19 Pandemic
Proposition 65: Trends and Highlights in May 2020 -
May 2020Proposition 65 Notices of the Month – April 2020: Plaintiffs Target Various Food Products Including Vinegars, Baby Food Pouches, Teething Wafers, Seaweed and Seafood Products Amidst the COVID-19 Pandemic and California Court Closures
Proposition 65: Trends and Highlights in April 2020 -
April 2020Proposition 65 Notices of the Month – March 2020: Plaintiff Groups “March On” and Send Hundreds of Notices of Violation During the COVID-19 Shelter-in-Place Orders
Proposition 65: Trends and Highlights in March 2020 -
March 2020Proposition 65 Notices of the Month – February 2020: Lead, Arsenic and Cadmium in Seaweed, Shrimp & Dietary Supplements, New Plaintiff Group Targets Baked Goods and Roasted Nut Products
Proposition 65: Trends and Highlights in February 2020 -
February 2020Proposition 65 Notices of the Month – January 2020: Arsenic, Cadmium and Lead in Seaweed & Seafood Products, Acrylamide in Toasted Corn, and Cadmium in Spinach
Proposition 65: Trends and Highlights in January 2020 -
January 20202019 A Creative Year for Proposition 65 Plaintiffs – Acrylamide in Ice Cream Cones, Cadmium and Lead in Seaweed, Furfuryl Alcohol in Hamburger Buns, and Chromium in Leather Work Gloves and Baby Powder
Proposition 65: Trends and Highlights in 2019