![]() |
|
| Water Quality Law Update | |
| Downey Brand Publications | |
| Summer 2005 NPDES Permits Remanded by California Supreme Court to Determine Whether Requirements were More Stringent than Federal Law.In 2001, Downey Brand successfully argued that three NPDES permits issued to the Cities of Los Angeles and Burbank were unlawful. The Los Angeles County Superior court agreed and sent these three permits back to the Regional Water Quality Control Board to be readopted. Although portions of these Superior Court decisions were overturned or clarified on appeal, the California Supreme Court ordered the Court of Appeal decision to remain unpublished and remanded the permits for further review by the trial court. If the trial court determines that the permits' requirements were more stringent than required by federal law, then the Regional Board was required to perform the analysis mandated by California Water Code section 13263 and the incorporated factors under Water Code section 13241 before issuing these requirements. The factors required under Water Code section 13241 include:
A hearing on the stringency issue has been set by the Los Angeles Superior Court on February 27, 2006. For more information on permit appeals or enforcement actions under permits, please contact Katharine Wagner, Melissa Thorme, Nicole Granquist, Missy Verhaag, and Jonathan Shardlow. Additional information concerning Downey Brand's Environmental Law Practice Group is available by clicking the link below. Environmental Law Practice Description Please contact us if you have questions or want more information. Please note that the information contained in this newsletter is not intended to provide legal advice. You should consult with an attorney and not rely on any information contained herein regarding your specific situation.
|
For more information, please contact:
|